J Med Genet

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2008

J Med Genet. Published Online First: 29 February 2008. doi:10.1136/jmg.2007.055806
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmg.2007.055806v1
45/8/513    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, J.
Right arrow Articles by Patch, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, J.
Right arrow Articles by Patch, C.

Original articles

A systematic review of the clinical validity and clinical utility of DNA testing for hereditary haemochromatosis in at-risk populations

Jackie Bryant 1*, Keith Cooper 1, Jo Picot 1, Andrew Clegg 1, Paul Roderick 2, William Rosenberg 3 and Christine Patch 4

1 SHTAC, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
2 University of Southampton Medical School, United Kingdom
3 Institute of Hepatology, University College London, United Kingdom
4 Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jsb1{at}soton.ac.uk.

Accepted 18 February 2008


*   Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical validity and clinical utility of DNA testing in people suspected of having hereditary haemochromatosis and in family members of those diagnosed with the disorder. Design A systematic review.

Methods Fifteen electronic databases were searched up to April 2007. Studies were included for assessment of clinical validity of genotyping for the C282Y mutation for the diagnosis of hereditary haemochromatosis if they considered the use of DNA tests in Caucasians of northern European origin with iron overload suggestive of haemochromatosis compared to a control population and reported, or allowed calculation of, sensitivity and specificity. For clinical utility, studies were included if participants were Caucasians with iron overload suggestive of haemochromatosis or relatives of suspected cases, compared a diagnostic strategy incorporating DNA testing with one without DNA testing and reported patient based outcomes or some measure of cost effectiveness.

Results Eleven studies were identified that could be used to evaluate clinical validity of genotyping for the C282Y mutation for the diagnosis of hereditary haemochromatosis. Clinical sensitivity of C282Y homozygosity for hereditary haemochromatosis ranged from 28.4% to 100%; when considering studies which used strict criteria to classify hereditary haemochromatosis clinical sensitivity ranged from 91.3% to 92.4%. No clinical effectiveness studies were found. Two cost-effectiveness studies were identified which suggest that gene testing may be cost-effective.

Conclusion DNA testing for hereditary haemochromatosis in at-risk populations has clinical validity and may have clinical utility. The review highlights the limitations of the literature and methodological difficulties associated with evaluating this genetic test.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.