Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 17 October 2008. doi:10.1136/jmg.2008.061697
Journal of Medical Genetics 2009;46:132-135
Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

LETTERS TO JMG

Effect of CHEK2 missense variant I157T on the risk of breast cancer in carriers of other CHEK2 or BRCA1 mutations

C Cybulski1, B Górski1, T Huzarski1, T Byrski1, J Gronwald1, T Debniak1, D Wokolorczyk1, A Jakubowska1, P Serrano-Fernández1, T Dork2, S A Narod3, J Lubinski1

1 International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
2 Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
3 Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto Ontario, Canada

Dr C Cybulski, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Polabska 4, 70–115 Szczecin, Poland; cezarycy{at}sci.pam.szczecin.pl

ABSTRACT

Background: Carriers of heterozygous mutations in CHEK2 or BRCA1 are at increased risk of breast cancer. These mutations are rare and a very small number of women in a population will carry two mutations. However, it is of interest to estimate the breast cancer risks associated with carrying two mutations because this information may be informative for genetic counsellors and may provide clues to the carcinogenic process.

Methods: We genotyped 7782 Polish breast cancer patients and 6233 controls for seven founder mutations in BRCA1 and CHEK2. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the mutations, singly and in combination.

Results: Of the 7782 women with breast cancer, 1091 had one mutation (14.0%) and 37 had two mutations (0.5%). Compared to controls, the odds ratio for a BRCA1 mutation in isolation was 13.1 (95% CI 8.2 to 21). The odds ratio was smaller for BRCA1 mutation carriers who also carried a CHEK2 mutation (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 29), but the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the odds ratio for women who carried two CHEK2 mutations (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 10) was greater than that for women who carried one CHEK2 mutation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.1). The odds ratio for women who carried both a truncating mutation and the missense mutation in CHEK2 was 7.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 56) and was greater than for women who carried the truncating mutation alone (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.3) or the missense mutation alone (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.9), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the risk of breast cancer in carriers of a deleterious CHEK2 mutation is increased if the second allele is the I157T missense variant. However, the presence of a CHEK2 mutation in women with a BRCA1 mutation may not increase their risk beyond that of the BRCA1 mutation alone. These suggestive findings need to be verified in other studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genetics jobs

Genetics jobs