HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) web only appendices All Versions of this Article: jmg.2007.054635v1 45/7/411    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Yoon, J S Articles by Lee, M G PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yoon, J S Articles by Lee, M G

Heterogeneity in the processing defect of SLC26A4 mutants

¹ Department of Pharmacology and Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
² Soree Ear Clinic, Seoul, Korea
³ Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
⁴ Department of Biomedical Science, National Institute of Health, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:
Professor Min Goo Lee, Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Sinchon-Dong, Seoul 120-752, Korea; mlee{at}yuhs.ac]

Background: Mutations in the SLC26A4 gene are responsible for Pendred syndrome and non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNB4). This study analysed non-synonymous SLC26A4 mutations newly identified in East Asians, as well as three common mutations in Caucasians, to characterise their molecular pathogenic mechanisms and to explore the possibility of rescuing their processing defects.

Methods: A total of 11 non-synonymous disease associated mutations were generated and their effects on protein processing and on ion transporting activities were examined.

Results: Most of the mutations caused retention of the SLC26A4 gene product (pendrin) in the intracellular region, while wild-type pendrin reached the plasma membrane. Accordingly, these mutations abolished complex glycosylation and Cl^–/HCO₃^– exchange activities of pendrin. However, significant heterogeneity in the processing of mutant pendrin molecules was observed. Each mutant protein exhibited a different cellular localisation, a different degree of N-glycosylation, and a different degree of sensitivity to the treatments that rescue processing defects. For example, H723R-pendrin, the most common mutation in East Asians, was mostly expressed in endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and its defects in protein processing and ion transporting activities were restored considerably by low temperature incubation. On the other hand, L236P-pendrin, the most common mutation in Caucasians, was mainly in the centrosomal region and was temperature insensitive.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the processing of pendrin mutant protein is determined by mutant specific mechanisms, and that a mutant specific method would be required to rescue the conformational defects of each folding mutant.