Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 21 December 2005. doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.039172
Journal of Medical Genetics 2006;43:665-670
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

MEDICAL GENETICS IN PRACTICE

Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder

G K Suthers1,2, J Armstrong1, J McCormack1, D Trott1

1 Familial Cancer Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Genetic Medicine, Children’s Youth and Women’s Health Service, North Adelaide, Australia
2 Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Australia

Correspondence to:
Dr G Suthers
Familial Cancer Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Genetic Medicine, Children’s Youth and Women’s Health Service, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia; graeme.suthers{at}cywhs.sa.gov.au

Objective: To increase the awareness among at risk relatives of the availability of genetic testing for a familial disorder while respecting their autonomy and privacy.

Methods: This was a comparison of preintervention and postintervention cohorts of families carried out in a state wide clinical service providing genetic counselling and testing for people at risk of familial adult onset cancer. Unaffected relatives who were not clients of the service in 74 kindreds with familial mutations causing familial breast and ovarian cancer, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, or Cowden syndrome were included in the study. In the baseline cohort (41 kindreds), family members who were clients of the clinical service and had been shown to be carriers of mutations were asked to advise relatives that genetic testing was available. In the intervention cohort (33 kindreds), the clinical service obtained consent to advise at risk relatives by letter that genetic testing was available. The main outcome measures were: (a) proportion of unaffected first and second degree relatives of the proband in each family whose genetic status was clarified within 2 years of the mutation being identified in the family, and (b) concerns regarding privacy and autonomy voiced by relatives receiving these letters.

Results: In the baseline cohort, the average proportion of relatives in each family whose genetic status was clarified was 23%. In the intervention cohort, the average proportion of relatives in each family whose genetic status was clarified was 40% (p = 0.001). None of the relatives in the intervention cohort complained of a breach of privacy or autonomy.

Conclusion: Clinical services can take an effective and proactive approach to notifying relatives who are not their clients of the availability of genetic testing without compromising principles of privacy and autonomy.

Abbreviations: FCS, Familial Cancer Service

Keywords: ethics; privacy; risk notification; genetic testing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hadfield, S G, Horara, S, Starr, B J, Yazdgerdi, S, Marks, D, Bhatnagar, D, Cramb, R, Egan, S, Everdell, R, Ferns, G, Jones, A, Marenah, C B, Marples, J, Prinsloo, P, Sneyd, A, Stewart, M F, Sandle, L, Wang, T, Watson, M S, Humphries, S E, on behalf of the Steering Group for the Department, (2009). Family tracing to identify patients with Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: the second Audit of the Department of Health Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cascade Testing Project. Ann Clin Biochem 46: 24-32 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Beetstra, S., Suthers, G., Dhillon, V., Salisbury, C., Turner, J., Altree, M., McKinnon, R., Fenech, M. (2008). Methionine-Dependence Phenotype in the de novo Pathway in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers with and without Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17: 2565-2571 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Crawford, G C, Lucassen, A M (2008). Disclosure of genetic information within families: a case report. Clin Ethics 3: 7-10 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aktan-Collan, K, Haukkala, A, Pylvanainen, K, Jarvinen, H J, Aaltonen, L A, Peltomaki, P, Rantanen, E, Kaariainen, H, Mecklin, J-P (2007). Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counselling and DNA testing. J. Med. Genet. 44: 732-738 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lucassen, A. (2007). Should families own genetic information? Yes. BMJ 335: 22-22 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genetics jobs

Genetics jobs