J Med Genet

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phelan, C M
Right arrow Articles by Monteiro, A N A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phelan, C M
Right arrow Articles by Monteiro, A N A
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Breast Cancer
*Ovarian Cancer
*Genetics Home Reference
Journal of Medical Genetics 2005;42:138-146
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Classification of BRCA1 missense variants of unknown clinical significance

C M Phelan1,*, V Dapic2,*, B Tice2, R Favis3, E Kwan1, F Barany3, S Manoukian4, P Radice4, R B van der Luijt5, B P M van Nesselrooij5, G Chenevix-Trench6 kConFab7, T Caldes8, M de La Hoya8, S Lindquist9, S V Tavtigian10, D Goldgar11, Å Borg12, S A Narod1, A N A Monteiro2

1 Center for Research in Women’s Health, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Strang Cancer Prevention Center, New York, USA
3 Department of Microbiology, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
4 Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy and FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
5 Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
6 Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Queensland, Australia
7 Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer; Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Australia
8 Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
9 John F Kennedy Institute, Glostrup, Denmark
10 Cancer Susceptibility Unit, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
11 Genetic Epidemiology Unit, International Agency for Research on Cancer
12 Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Dr Alvaro N Monteiro
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; monteian{at}moffitt.usf.edu] Background: BRCA1 is a tumour suppressor with pleiotropic actions. Germline mutations in BRCA1 are responsible for a large proportion of breast–ovarian cancer families. Several missense variants have been identified throughout the gene but because of lack of information about their impact on the function of BRCA1, predictive testing is not always informative. Classification of missense variants into deleterious/high risk or neutral/low clinical significance is essential to identify individuals at risk.

Objective: To investigate a panel of missense variants.

Methods and results: The panel was investigated in a comprehensive framework that included (1) a functional assay based on transcription activation; (2) segregation analysis and a method of using incomplete pedigree data to calculate the odds of causality; (3) a method based on interspecific sequence variation. It was shown that the transcriptional activation assay could be used as a test to characterise mutations in the carboxy-terminus region of BRCA1 encompassing residues 1396–1863. Thirteen missense variants (H1402Y, L1407P, H1421Y, S1512I, M1628T, M1628V, T1685I, G1706A, T1720A, A1752P, G1788V, V1809F, and W1837R) were specifically investigated.

Conclusions: While individual classification schemes for BRCA1 alleles still present limitations, a combination of several methods provides a more powerful way of identifying variants that are causally linked to a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The framework presented here brings these variants nearer to clinical applicability.


Abbreviations: DBD, DNA binding domain

Keywords: BRCA1; mutation; transcription; tumour suppressor




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Giannini, C. Capalbo, L. Ottini, A. Buffone, L. De Marchis, E. Margaria, D. Vitolo, E. Ricevuto, C. Rinaldi, M. Zani, et al.
Clinical Classification of BRCA1 DNA Missense Variants: H1686Q Is a Novel Pathogenic Mutation Occurring in the Ontogenetically Invariant THV Motif of the N-Terminal BRCT Domain
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 26(25): 4212 - 4214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
C Bonnet, S Krieger, M Vezain, A Rousselin, I Tournier, A Martins, P Berthet, A Chevrier, C Dugast, V Layet, et al.
Screening BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants for splicing mutations using reverse transcription PCR on patient RNA and an ex vivo assay based on a splicing reporter minigene
J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2008; 45(7): 438 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M. A Carvalho and A. N A Monteiro
Correction: Functional analysis of BRCA1 M1628V variant
J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2007; 44(5): e78 - e78.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Carvalho, S. M. Marsillac, R. Karchin, S. Manoukian, S. Grist, R. F. Swaby, T. P. Urmenyi, E. Rondinelli, R. Silva, L. Gayol, et al.
Determination of Cancer Risk Associated with Germ Line BRCA1 Missense Variants by Functional Analysis
Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1494 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Kote-Jarai, L. Matthews, A. Osorio, S. Shanley, I. Giddings, F. Moreews, I. Locke, D. G. Evans, D. Eccles, The Carrier Clinic Collaborators, et al.
Accurate Prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Heterozygous Genotype Using Expression Profiling after Induced DNA Damage.
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 12(13): 3896 - 3901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
S V Tavtigian, A M Deffenbaugh, L Yin, T Judkins, T Scholl, P B Samollow, D de Silva, A Zharkikh, and A Thomas
Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral
J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2006; 43(4): 295 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
P K Lovelock, S Healey, W Au, E Y M Sum, A Tesoriero, E M Wong, S Hinson, R Brinkworth, A Bekessy, O Diez, et al.
Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2006; 43(1): 74 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Judkins, B. C. Hendrickson, A. M. Deffenbaugh, K. Eliason, B. Leclair, M. J. Norton, B. E. Ward, D. Pruss, and T. Scholl
Application of Embryonic Lethal or Other Obvious Phenotypes to Characterize the Clinical Significance of Genetic Variants Found in Trans with Known Deleterious Mutations
Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 10096 - 10103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.