|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
api
2,*,
B Tice2,
R Favis3,
E Kwan1,
F Barany3,
S Manoukian4,
P Radice4,
R B van der Luijt5,
B P M van Nesselrooij5,
G Chenevix-Trench6 kConFab7,
T Caldes8,
M de La Hoya8,
S Lindquist9,
S V Tavtigian10,
D Goldgar11,
Å Borg12,
S A Narod1,
A N A Monteiro2
1 Center for Research in Womens Health, Womens College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Strang Cancer Prevention Center, New York, USA
3 Department of Microbiology, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
4 Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy and FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
5 Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
6 Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Queensland, Australia
7 Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer; Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Australia
8 Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
9 John F Kennedy Institute, Glostrup, Denmark
10 Cancer Susceptibility Unit, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
11 Genetic Epidemiology Unit, International Agency for Research on Cancer
12 Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Correspondence to:
Dr Alvaro N Monteiro
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; monteian{at}moffitt.usf.edu]
Background: BRCA1 is a tumour suppressor with pleiotropic actions. Germline mutations in BRCA1 are responsible for a large proportion of breastovarian cancer families. Several missense variants have been identified throughout the gene but because of lack of information about their impact on the function of BRCA1, predictive testing is not always informative. Classification of missense variants into deleterious/high risk or neutral/low clinical significance is essential to identify individuals at risk.
Objective: To investigate a panel of missense variants.
Methods and results: The panel was investigated in a comprehensive framework that included (1) a functional assay based on transcription activation; (2) segregation analysis and a method of using incomplete pedigree data to calculate the odds of causality; (3) a method based on interspecific sequence variation. It was shown that the transcriptional activation assay could be used as a test to characterise mutations in the carboxy-terminus region of BRCA1 encompassing residues 13961863. Thirteen missense variants (H1402Y, L1407P, H1421Y, S1512I, M1628T, M1628V, T1685I, G1706A, T1720A, A1752P, G1788V, V1809F, and W1837R) were specifically investigated.
Conclusions: While individual classification schemes for BRCA1 alleles still present limitations, a combination of several methods provides a more powerful way of identifying variants that are causally linked to a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The framework presented here brings these variants nearer to clinical applicability.
Abbreviations: DBD, DNA binding domain
Keywords: BRCA1; mutation; transcription; tumour suppressor
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Giannini, C. Capalbo, L. Ottini, A. Buffone, L. De Marchis, E. Margaria, D. Vitolo, E. Ricevuto, C. Rinaldi, M. Zani, et al. Clinical Classification of BRCA1 DNA Missense Variants: H1686Q Is a Novel Pathogenic Mutation Occurring in the Ontogenetically Invariant THV Motif of the N-Terminal BRCT Domain J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 26(25): 4212 - 4214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Bonnet, S Krieger, M Vezain, A Rousselin, I Tournier, A Martins, P Berthet, A Chevrier, C Dugast, V Layet, et al. Screening BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants for splicing mutations using reverse transcription PCR on patient RNA and an ex vivo assay based on a splicing reporter minigene J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2008; 45(7): 438 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Carvalho and A. N A Monteiro Correction: Functional analysis of BRCA1 M1628V variant J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2007; 44(5): e78 - e78. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Carvalho, S. M. Marsillac, R. Karchin, S. Manoukian, S. Grist, R. F. Swaby, T. P. Urmenyi, E. Rondinelli, R. Silva, L. Gayol, et al. Determination of Cancer Risk Associated with Germ Line BRCA1 Missense Variants by Functional Analysis Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1494 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Kote-Jarai, L. Matthews, A. Osorio, S. Shanley, I. Giddings, F. Moreews, I. Locke, D. G. Evans, D. Eccles, The Carrier Clinic Collaborators, et al. Accurate Prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Heterozygous Genotype Using Expression Profiling after Induced DNA Damage. Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 12(13): 3896 - 3901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S V Tavtigian, A M Deffenbaugh, L Yin, T Judkins, T Scholl, P B Samollow, D de Silva, A Zharkikh, and A Thomas Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2006; 43(4): 295 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P K Lovelock, S Healey, W Au, E Y M Sum, A Tesoriero, E M Wong, S Hinson, R Brinkworth, A Bekessy, O Diez, et al. Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2006; 43(1): 74 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Judkins, B. C. Hendrickson, A. M. Deffenbaugh, K. Eliason, B. Leclair, M. J. Norton, B. E. Ward, D. Pruss, and T. Scholl Application of Embryonic Lethal or Other Obvious Phenotypes to Characterize the Clinical Significance of Genetic Variants Found in Trans with Known Deleterious Mutations Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 10096 - 10103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |