J Med Genet

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Maarel, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Frants, R. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Maarel, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Frants, R. R
J Med Genet 1999;36:823-828 ( November )

A new dosage test for subtelomeric 4;10 translocations improves conventional diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD)

Silvère M van der Maarela, Giancarlo Deidda* b, Richard J L F Lemmersa, Egbert Bakkera, Michiel J R van der Wielena, Lodewijk Sandkuijla, Jane E Hewittdagger c, George W Padbergd, Rune R Frantsa

a MGC-Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Wassenaarseweg 72, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, b Institute of Cell Biology, CNR, Rome, Italy, c School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, d Department of Neurology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Dr van der Maarel.

Revised version received 8 June 1999; Accepted for publication 21 July 1999

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by the size reduction of a polymorphic repeat array on 4q35. Probe p13E-11 recognises this chromosomal rearrangement and is generally used for diagnosis. However, diagnosis of FSHD is complicated by three factors. First, the probe cross hybridises to a highly homologous repeat array locus on chromosome 10q26. Second, although a BlnI polymorphism allows discrimination between the repeat units on chromosomes 4 and 10 and greatly facilitates FSHD diagnosis, the occurrence of translocations between chromosomes 4 and 10 further complicates accurate FSHD diagnosis. Third, the recent identification of deletions of p13E-11 in both control and FSHD populations is an additional complicating factor. Although pulsed field gel electrophoresis is very useful and sometimes necessary to detect these rearrangements, this technique is not operational in most FSHD diagnostic laboratories. Moreover, repeat arrays >200 kb are often difficult to detect and can falsely suggest a deletion of p13E-11. Therefore, we have developed an easy and reliable Southern blotting method to identify exchanges between 4 type and 10 type repeat arrays and deletions of p13E-11. This BglII-BlnI dosage test addresses all the above mentioned complicating factors and can be carried out in addition to the standard Southern blot analysis for FSHD diagnosis as performed in most laboratories. It will enhance the specificity and sensitivity of conventional FSHD diagnosis to the values obtained by PFGE based diagnosis of FSHD. Moreover, this study delimits the FSHD candidate gene region by mapping the 4;10 translocation breakpoint proximal to the polymorphic BlnI site in the first repeat unit.


Keywords: FSHD; diagnosis; dosage; subtelomere


* Present address: MGC-Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.

dagger Present address: Division of Genetics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.


© 1999 by J Med Genet



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. L. Deak, R. J.L.F Lemmers, J. M. Stajich, R. Klooster, R. Tawil, R. R. Frants, M. C. Speer, S. M. van der Maarel, and J. R. Gilbert
Genotype-phenotype study in an FSHD family with a proximal deletion encompassing p13E-11 and D4Z4
Neurology, February 20, 2007; 68(8): 578 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
N Shahrizaila and A J Wills
Significance of Beevor's sign in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and other neuromuscular diseases
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 76(6): 869 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M M O Tonini, R C M Pavanello, J Gurgel-Giannetti, R J Lemmers, S M van der Maarel, R R Frants, and M Zatz
Homozygosity for autosomal dominant facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) does not result in a more severe phenotype
J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2004; 41(2): e17 - 17.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
K Goto, I Nishino, and Y K Hayashi
Very low penetrance in 85 Japanese families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1A
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2004; 41(1): e12 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
M. Krasnianski, K. Eger, S. Neudecker, S. Jakubiczka, and S. Zierz
Atypical Phenotypes in Patients With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 4q35 Deletion
Arch Neurol, October 1, 2003; 60(10): 1421 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. J.L.F. Lemmers, M. Osborn, T. Haaf, M. Rogers, R. R. Frants, G. W. Padberg, D. N. Cooper, S. M. van der Maarel, and M. Upadhyaya
D4F104S1 deletion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: Phenotype, size, and detection
Neurology, July 22, 2003; 61(2): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.