Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?

M Watson, V Duvivier, M Wade Walsh, S Ashley, J Davidson, M Papaikonomou, V Murday, N Sacks, R Eeles

Royal Marsden NHS Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

The current study has two aims: (1) to look at people's recall of risk information after genetic counselling and (2) to determine the impact of receiving an audiotape of the genetic consultation on level of recall, cancer related worry, and women's uptake of risk management methods. Using a prospective randomised controlled design, subjects receiving an audiotape were compared with a standard consultation group. Participants were drawn from attenders at the genetic clinics of two London hospitals and included 115 women with a family history of breast cancer. Assessment of perceived genetic risk, mental health, cancer worry, and health behaviour was made before counselling at the clinic (baseline) and by postal follow up. Usefulness of audiotapes and satisfaction with the clinical service was assessed by study specific measures. The data indicate that cancer worry is reduced by provision of an audiotape of the genetic consultation. Recall of the genetic risk figure, however, is not affected by provision of an audiotape and neither is it related to women's overall perception of being more or less at risk of breast cancer than the average woman. Forty-one percent of women accurately recalled their personal risk of breast cancer at one month follow up; however, 25% overestimated, 11% underestimated, and 23% could not remember or did not know their breast cancer risk. Recall of the risk figure is more accurate when the clinical geneticist has given this to the woman as an odds ratio rather than in other formats. Subsequent health behaviour is unaffected by whether women have an audiotape record of their genetic consultation. Results suggest that having a precise risk figure may be less important than women taking away from the consultation an impression that something can be offered to help them manage that risk. Provision of an audiotape of the consultation is of limited usefulness. The need for psychological care to be better integrated into genetic counselling at cancer family clinics was highlighted by the study. The results are discussed in terms of future service development.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The use of audiotapes in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families: a randomised trial

E Lobb, P Butow, B Meiser, A Barratt, J Kirk, M Gattas, E Haan, K Tucker
J. Med. Genet. 2002 39: 697-703. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Watson, P. W., McKinstry, B. (2009). A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations. JRSM 102: 235-243 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tyndel, S., Austoker, J., Henderson, B. J., Brain, K., Bankhead, C., Clements, A., Watson, E. K. (2007). What Is the Psychological Impact of Mammographic Screening on Younger Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer? Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study by the PIMMS Management Group. JCO 25: 3823-3830 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eisinger, F. (2007). Prophylactic mastectomy: ethical issues. Br Med Bull 0: ldm003v1-13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Webster, P., Austoker, J. (2006). Women's knowledge about breast cancer risk and their views of the purpose and implications of breast screening--a questionnaire survey. J Public Health (Oxf) 28: 197-202 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wang, C., Bowen, D. J., Kardia, S. L. R. (2005). Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics. Health Educ Behav 32: 686-701 [Abstract]  
• Madalinska, J. B., Hollenstein, J., Bleiker, E., van Beurden, M., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Massuger, L. F., Gaarenstroom, K. N., Mourits, M. J.E., Verheijen, R. H.M., van Dorst, E. B.L., van der Putten, H., van der Velden, K., Boonstra, H., Aaronson, N. K. (2005). Quality-of-Life Effects of Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy Versus Gynecologic Screening Among Women at Increased Risk of Hereditary Ovarian Cancer. JCO 23: 6890-6898 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nelson, H. D., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R., Harris, E. L. (2005). Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED 143: 362-379 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Evans, M., Bergum, V., Bamforth, S., MacPhail, S. (2004). Relational Ethics and Genetic Counseling. Nurs Ethics 11: 459-471 [Abstract]  
• Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., Walter, F., Prevost, A. T., Sutton, S. (2004). Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 122-133 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lobb, E A, Butow, P N, Meiser, B, Barratt, A, Gaff, C, Young, M A, Kirk, J, Gattas, M, Gleeson, M, Tucker, K (2003). Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes. J. Med. Genet. 40: e56-56 [Full Text]  
• Metcalfe, K. A., Narod, S. A. (2002). Breast Cancer Risk Perception Among Women Who Have Undergone Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1564-1569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lobb, E, Butow, P, Meiser, B, Barratt, A, Kirk, J, Gattas, M, Haan, E, Tucker, K (2002). The use of audiotapes in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families: a randomised trial. J. Med. Genet. 39: 697-703 [Full Text]  
• Westman, J., Hampel, H., Bradley, T. (2000). Efficacy of a touchscreen computer based family cancer history questionnaire and subsequent cancer risk assessment. J. Med. Genet. 37: 354-360 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Croyle, R. T., Lerman, C. (1999). Risk Communication in Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999: 59-66 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rimer, B. K., Glassman, B. (1999). Is There a Use for Tailored Print Communications in Cancer Risk Communication?. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999: 140-148 [Abstract] [Full Text]